Unknown

(HC) Ayala v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 9, 20212:21-cv-00601California438 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FELIX R. AYALA, No. 2:21-cv-00601 GGH P Petitioner, v. ORDER UNKNOWN, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner at Salinas Valley State Prison, has filed a document styled as a motion for extension of time to file an application for writ of habeas corpus. ECF No. 1. No other pleadings have been filed by the petitioner. In order to commence an action, petitioner must file a petition for writ of habeas corpus as required by Rule 3 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases, and petitioner must either pay the required filing fee or file an application requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a). See also e.g., Martinez v. Unknown, 2021 WL 606252 (E.D. Cal. 2021). The court will not issue any orders granting or denying relief until an action has been properly commenced. Therefore, petitioner’s motion for //// //// //// //// extension of time will be denied without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.