Santiesteban

(PC) Valenzuela v. Santiesteban

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 9, 20211:20-cv-01093California2,138 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MARIO A. VALENZUELA, Case No. 1:20-cv-01093-NONE-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO STAY CIVIL ACTION UNTIL

v. STATE’S CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

AGAINST PLAINTIFF ARE RESOLVED

SANTIESTEBAN, et al., (ECF No. 34) Defendants.

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO

FILE STATUS REPORTS REGARDING

CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

NINETY (90) DAY DEADLINE

17 I. Introduction Plaintiff Mario A. Valenzuela (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendants Santiesteban, Rodriguez, and Alejo for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment and against Defendant Perez for failure to protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment, arising from the incident on June 22, 2019. Currently before the Court is Defendants’ Notice of Related Cases, Motion to Stay, and Request for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.