Unknown

(PC) Anderson v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 14, 20212:21-cv-00749California288 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIC Z. ANDERSON, No. 2:21-cv-0749 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND UNKNOWN, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendant. 16 On May 5, 2021, plaintiff was granted 30 days within which to file a complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file a complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Plaintiff has not responded to the May 5, 2021 order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.