Pleshchuck

(PC) Harris v. Pleshchuck

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 9, 20212:19-cv-01751California500 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TEVIN LEE HARRIS, No. 2: 19-cv-1751 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS R. VALENCIA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order. (ECF No. 53.) For the reasons stated herein, the undersigned recommends that this motion be denied. This action proceeds on plaintiff’s third amended complaint against defendant R. Pleshchuck, Ph.D., employed at California State Prison-Sacramento (“CSP-Sac”). Plaintiff alleges that defendant Pleshchuck denied plaintiff’s requests for adequate mental health care in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Plaintiff was housed in the Los Angeles County Jail (“Jail”) when he filed the pending motion. Court records reflect that plaintiff is now housed at North Kern State Prison (“NKSP”). (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.