Cardenas

Cardenas v. Aaron's, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 9, 20212:20-cv-01327California2,158 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LUIS H. CASTRO CARDENAS, an No. 2:20-cv-01327-TLN-AC individual, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, ORDER v. AARON’S, INC. and DOES 1–50, Defendant. 17 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Aaron’s, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Stay Plaintiff’s Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) Claim. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff Luis H. Castro Cardenas (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 8.) Defendant filed a reply. (ECF No. 9.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion. /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed the instant class action lawsuit against Defendant, Plaintiff’s former employer, on January 29, 2020. (See ECF No. 1 at 16–33.) Plaintiff filed the operative First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on May 8, 2020. (See id. at 34–50.) Plaintiff alleges various violations of the Labor Code…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.