(PS)Seneka

(PS)Seneka v. County of Yolo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 9, 20212:20-cv-01621California320 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHANA SENEKA, No. 2:20-cv-01621-TLN-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS COUNTY OF YOLO, et al., Defendant. 16 Plaintiff proceeds pro se in this action, which was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(3) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In an order entered on April 14, 2021, the court granted defendants’ motions to dismiss and dismissed all claims in the first amended complaint. Plaintiff was granted thirty days to file a second amended complaint. (ECF No. 29.) The time granted for plaintiff to file a second amended complaint has passed and plaintiff has neither filed a second amended complaint nor sought an extension of time to do so. Accordingly, IT IS RECOMMENDED: 1. This action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); and 2. The Clerk’s office be directed to close this case. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.