Soto
Soto v. County of Sacramento
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SILVIA SOTO, LATANYA ANDREWS, No. 2:19-cv-00910-TLN-DB and minors M.M.S. and M.M.S., by and through their guardian ad litem, SILVIA SOTO, individually and as successors-in- interest to the ESTATE OF MARSHALL ORDER
MILES,
14 Plaintiffs, 15 v.
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, BLAKE
GRINDER, KENNETH LLOYD, JOHN
HIGLEY, ANDREW GARSIDE, GREG
WHITE, KELLEY BUNN, GREGORY
JOHNSON, CHARLES GAILEY, SCOTT
JONES, PATRICIA ROBINSON-HARD, and Does 1 through 100, 20 Defendants.
22 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Silvia Soto, individually and as guardian ad litem for M.M.S. and M.M.S., and Latanya Andrews’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion to Modify the Court’s Pretrial Scheduling Order. (ECF No. 58.) Defendants Kelley Bunn, County of Sacramento, Charles Gailey, Andrew Garside, Blake Grinder, John Higley, Gregory Johnson, /// /// Scott Jones, and Kenneth Lloyd (collectively, “Defendants”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 61.) Plaintiffs filed a reply. (ECF No. 64.) For the reasons set…