Demetrio A. Quintero II v. Merced Unified School District
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DEMETRIO A. QUINTERO, Case No. 1:20-cv-01439-NONE-BAM
Plaintiff,
SCREENING ORDER GRANTING
v. PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO AMEND MERCED UNIFIED SCHOOL (Doc. No. 1) DISTRICT, et al and DOES 1 to 8, THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE Defendants.
13 Plaintiff Demetrio A. Quintero, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed the instant 14 action on October 9, 2020. (Doc. No. 1.)
I. Screening Requirement and Standard
16 The Court screens complaints brought by persons proceeding pro se and in forma 17 pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to 18 dismissal if it is frivolous or malicious, if it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be 19 granted, or if it seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 20 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). 21 A complaint must contain “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief ...” Fed. R. Civ. P.…