Meier

(PC) Stokes v. Meier

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 12, 20212:19-cv-02496California1,737 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTWONE STOKES, No. 2:19-cv-2496 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ROSS MEIR, et al.,1 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 1, 4. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). For the reasons stated below, plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. The court shall also order that the complaint be served on defendants Meir and Pierce, correctional officers at California State Prison – Sacramento. //// //// 26 A review of the records provided by plaintiff indicate that the correct spelling of this defendant’s last name is “Meier.” See ECF No. 1 at 8. Therefore, the Clerk of Court will be directed to change the spelling in the case caption of the docket. Throughout this order, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.