Estate of Alejandro Sanchez v. County of Stanislaus

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20211:18-cv-00977California2,714 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ESTATE OF ALEJANDRO SANCHEZ, et Case No. 1:18-cv-00977-DAD-BAM al., ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ Plaintiffs, MOTIONS TO COMPEL, FOR SANCTIONS AND FOR EXPENSES RE: HECTOR vs. LONGORIA DOCUMENTS 12 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., (Doc. 89) 13 Defendants.

15

Currently before the Court are Plaintiffs Estate of Alejandro Sanchez and Bertha Sanchez’ (“Plaintiffs”) motion to compel Defendants County of Stanislaus, Stanislaus County Sheriff’s Department, Shane Rohn, Brett Babbitt, Eugene Day, Justin Camara, Joseph Knittel, Zebedee Poust and Hector Longoria (“Defendants”) to produce the written summary statement and video-recorded post-incident interview of Defendant Hector Longoria. Plaintiffs also move for sanctions and for expenses. (Doc. 89.) On April 16, 2021, the parties filed a Joint Statement Re: Discovery Disagreement pursuant to Local Rule 251. (Doc. 91.) The Court deemed the matter suitable for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.