Dragados/Flatiron

West Pacific Electric Company Corporation v. Dragados/Flatiron

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 19, 20211:18-cv-00166California27,796 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 1:18-cv-00166-NONE-BAM Document 103 Filed 04/19/21 Page 1 of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WEST PACIFIC ELECTRIC COMPANY No. 1:18-cv-00166-NONE-BAM

CORPORATION,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ Plaintiff, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR PARTIAL v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 DRAGADOS/FLATIRON, et al., (Doc. No. 82) 15 Defendants.

This action arises from a construction dispute over a segment of the California High

Speed Rail Project extending from Fresno to Bakersfield, also known as the Construction

Package 2-3 or CP 2-3 project. After the California High-Speed Rail Authority (“CHSRA”)

contracted with defendant Dragados/Flatiron, a joint venture, (“DFJV”) to design and build the

CP 2-3 project, DFJV in turn subcontracted a portion of the project to plaintiff West…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.