Hill

Hill v. Jetblue Airways Corporation

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 20, 20212:17-cv-01604California756 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHELLE HILL, an individual, and No. 2:17-cv-1604 WBS DB ARIEL EPSTEIN POLLACK, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, 16 Defendant.

ERICKA BOHNEL, an individual, and No. 2:18-cv-0081 WBS DB ROSA MARTINEZ, an individual, 19 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, 23 Defendant.

25 On March 30, 2021, plaintiffs filed motions to compel in these related actions and noticed the motions for hearing before the undersigned on April 23, 2021, pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(1). On April 16, 2021, the parties filed Joint Statements re Discovery Disagreement pursuant to Local Rule 251 in connection with those motions to compel. Review of the parties’ Joint Statements finds “the proverbial ‘dog’s breakfast’” of issues, arguments, and errors. Becker v. Anglea, No. 2:19-cv-0013 KJM GGH P, 2020 WL 6058278, at *13 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2020). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.