Cantil-Sakauye

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID R. GARCIA, Case No. 1:20-cv-01077-NONE-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS ACTION

v.

TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, et al., (Doc. 1) Defendants. 14-DAY DEADLINE

16 Plaintiff brings this action against governmental officers or employees for alleged constitutional violations. Plaintiff alleges that that Tani Cantil-Sakauye violated his Fourteenth Amendment due process and equal protection rights by denying his state petition for writ of habeas corpus and that Randolf Grounds and Ken Allen violated his Fourteenth Amendment due process and equal protection rights in denying him parole, entitling him to a new parole hearing and damages. (Doc. 1.) The Court finds that Plaintiff fails to state a cognizable claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court further finds that the deficiencies in the complaint cannot be cured by amendment and therefore recommends dismissal of this action. See Akhtar v. Mesa, 698 F.3d 1202, 1212–13…