Caballero

Caballero v. Williams

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 20, 20212:21-cv-00638California1,264 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Cesar Caballero, et al., No. 2:21-cv-00638-KJM-CKD Plaintiffs, ORDER Vv. Michael Williams, et al., Defendants. 16 Cesar Caballero moves ex parte for a temporary restraining order barring the defendants 18 from interfering with or delaying “any project” that he might undertake “in developing, creating, implementing, operating and managing various projects” on land in Davis, California and to 20 prevent the defendants from harassing Mr. Caballero. See Mot. TRO at 2, ECF No. 5; Mem. P.& A., ECF No. 5-1; Compl., ECF No. 1. The motion is denied. A temporary restraining order or “TRO” may be issued only upon a showing “that immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result to the movant before the adverse 24 party can be heard in opposition.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(1)(A). The purpose of such an order is to preserve the status quo and to prevent irreparable harm “just so…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.