Pickett

(PC) Rabb v. Pickett

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 20, 20212:21-cv-00689California526 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAMED D. RABB, No. 2:21-cv-0689 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JASON PICKETT, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 together with a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff has not, however, filed his application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on the form used by this district. Accordingly, plaintiff’s application will be dismissed and plaintiff will be provided the opportunity to submit the application on the appropriate form. Plaintiff is cautioned that he must also provide a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint. In addition, plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. District courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.