Quair

Quair v. Cru

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 21, 20211:21-cv-00560California968 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID SABINO QUAIR, III, Case No. 1:21-cv-00560-NONE-SKO

Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING AMENDED ORDER

GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

OFFICER CRU, et al., PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Defendants. (Docs. 2 & 4)

F OURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE _____________________________________/

17 18 On April 2, 2021, Plaintiff David Sabino Quair, III (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 1) and requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (“Section 1915”) (Doc. 2). On April 8, 2021, the Court granted Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 4.) As Plaintiff has at least three “strikes” under Section 1915(g), the amended order granting leave to proceed in forma pauperis…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.