Conanon

(PC) Hisle v. Conanon

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20211:17-cv-01400California8,286 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DENNIS CURTIS HISLE, ) Case No. 1:17-cv-01400-NONE-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. ) REGARDING PARTIES’ MOTIONS FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

) MARLYN CONANAN, et al., ) (ECF Nos. 127, 128) Defendants. ) ) )

Plaintiff Dennis Curtis Hisle is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Defendant Ahmed’s motion for summary judgment, filed on September 11, 2020, and Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, filed on September 14, 2020. (ECF Nos. 127, 128.) I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND This action is proceeding against Defendants Conanan and Ahmed for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Defendant Ahmed filed an answer to the complaint on October 30, 2019. (ECF No. 91.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.