Williams v. Fresno County Department of Child Support Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 21, 20211:21-cv-00434California5,765 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PRINCE PAUL RAYMOND WILLIAMS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00434-NONE-EPG Plaintiff, v. SCREENING ORDER FRESNO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO: CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES, et al., (1) FILE A SECOND AMENDED Defendants. COMPLAINT; OR 16 (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE WISHES TO STAND ON HIS FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT

18 (ECF No. 5)

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

20 Plaintiff Prince Paul Raymond Williams (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on March 16, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) On April 6, 2021, before the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). (ECF No. 5.) The FAC’s claims relate to various child support and wage and income withholding orders issued by the state court. (Id.) The Court finds that the Complaint fails to state any cognizable claims. After…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.