(PC) Acosta v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20211:20-cv-01209California4,710 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 LOUIS ACOSTA, Case No. 1:20-cv-01209-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND BE

K. MCNEAL, et al., GRANTED; THAT THIS ACTION

PROCEED ON PLAINTIFF’S EIGHTH Defendants.

AMENDMENT CLAIMS AGAINST

DEFENDANTS MCNEAL, MOORE,

MONTOYA, AND WELCH FOR

DELIBERATE INDIFFERENCE TO HIS

SERIOUS MEDICAL NEEDS AND HIS

ADA CLAIM AGAINST THE CDCR; AND

THAT ALL OTHER CLAIMS BE

DISMISSED

(ECF No. 24)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN (14) DAYS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN

DISTRICT JUDGE

24 Louis Acosta (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 25 this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding “on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.