Dirkse

Gullatt III v. Dirkse

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20211:20-cv-00473California520 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN JACOB GULLATT, III, Case No. 1:20-cv-00473-NONE-EPG Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

JEFF DIRKSE, et al., (ECF No. 21) Defendants.

16 John Jacob Gullatt, III (“Plaintiff”) is a pretrial detainee or federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 14, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of counsel, stating, in part, that the complexity of this case and his inability, until just recently, to access the law library warrant the Court’s appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 21). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1), the Court may request that an attorney represent an indigent party in a civil case. However, the appointment of counsel is not a constitutional right, and the Court cannot require an attorney to represent a party. See Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997), withdrawn in part on other…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.