Bravdrick

(PC) Correa v. Bravdrick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 15, 20211:19-cv-00369California1,947 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANGELO CORREA, No. 1:19-cv-00369-DAD-JLT (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

BRAUDRICK, et al., DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

Defendants.

16 (Doc. Nos. 37, 59)

18 Plaintiff Angelo Correa is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 27, 2020, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on the grounds that plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit, as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (“PLRA”). (Doc. No. 37.) After requesting and receiving multiple extensions of time, on October 5, 2020, plaintiff’s opposition was docketed. (Doc. No. 42.) On October 14, 2020, defendants filed their…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.