Waddle

(PC) Castro v. Waddle

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20211:20-cv-01454California3,809 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL Z. CASTRO, Case No. 1:20-cv-01454-NONE-EPG-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

RECOMMENDING FIRST AMENDED

v. COMPLAINT BE DISMISSED WITH

PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

C. WADDLE,

CLAIM, FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, AND

Defendant. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT

ORDER

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

DAYS

17 I. INTRODUCTION Daniel Z. Castro (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on October 6, 2020. (ECF No. 1). The complaint was on the Eastern District of California form and checked the boxes for “Access to the court,” “Retaliation,” and “Threat to safety” but did not include any supporting facts. (Id.). On January 4, 2021, the Court entered an order finding that the complaint failed to state any cognizable claims because it did not comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.