Waddle
(PC) Castro v. Waddle
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20211:20-cv-01454California3,809 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DANIEL Z. CASTRO, Case No. 1:20-cv-01454-NONE-EPG-PC
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMENDING FIRST AMENDED
v. COMPLAINT BE DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO STATE A
C. WADDLE,
CLAIM, FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, AND
Defendant. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT
ORDER
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
DAYS
17 I. INTRODUCTION Daniel Z. Castro (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on October 6, 2020. (ECF No. 1). The complaint was on the Eastern District of California form and checked the boxes for “Access to the court,” “Retaliation,” and “Threat to safety” but did not include any supporting facts. (Id.). On January 4, 2021, the Court entered an order finding that the complaint failed to state any cognizable claims because it did not comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8.…