Hamilton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAE HENDERSON, JR., Case No. 1:21-cv-00697-NONE-SKO

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

v. F CO OR M P PL LA YI N WT ITIF HF ’ TS H F EA CIL OU UR RE T T ’SO O RDER 12 (Doc. 3) JEFFREY Y. HAMILTON, et al.,

TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

Defendants.

15 _____________________________________/

17 18 Plaintiff Dae Henderson, Jr., a prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a complaint on April 28, 2021, along with a “Notice of Surety Bond and Request to Proceed with Accompanying Court Papers Without Prepayment of Costs.” (Docs. 1, 2.) On May 3, 2021, the undersigned issued an order identifying several deficiencies in Plaintiff’s application to proceed without the prepayment of fees, providing him with another application form to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), and directing him to file an amended IFP application that corrects the identified deficiencies within thirty days. (Doc. 3.) More than thirty days have lapsed without…