Bohnel

Bohnel v. Jetblue Airways Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 15, 20212:18-cv-00081California1,072 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHELLE HILL, an individual, and No. 2:17-cv-1604 WBS DB ARIEL EPSTEIN POLLACK, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, 16 Defendant.

ERICKA BOHNEL, an individual, and No. 2:18-cv-0081 WBS DB ROSA MARTINEZ, an individual, 19 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, 23 Defendant.

25 On May 28, 2021, this matter came before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(1) for hearing of the parties’ joint motions for discovery. The motions were granted in part and denied in part. (Hill ECF No. 72; Bohnel ECF No. 68.) On June 1, 2021, the undersigned issued a written order pursuant to the May 28, 2021 hearing, ordering in relevant part that within fourteen days “defendant shall produce to plaintiffs the ASAP reports at issue[.]” (ECF No. 73 at 2.) On June 11, 2021, defendant filed an “EMERGENCY MOTION” to stay the June 1, 2021…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.