Haddad
(PC) Casey v. Haddad
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOMINIQUE ZAFIR CASEY, Case No. 1:21-cv-00855-SKO (PC)
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
HADDAD, et al., (Doc. 2)
Defendants. 14-DAY DEADLINE
Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge 17 Plaintiff Dominque Zafir Casey is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this action. On May 27, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 2.) According to the inmate trust account statement submitted by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Plaintiff had more than $1,000 in his trust account as of March 4, 2021, and approximately $470 as of May 19, 2021, (Doc. 6). This is enough to pay the $402 filing fee for this action. Therefore, the Court issued an order to show cause why Plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP should not be denied. (Doc.…