Eaton

(PC) Ventura v. Eaton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20211:21-cv-00926California1,237 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUBEN VENTURA, Case No. 1:21-cv-00926-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE v.

WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

13 PATRICK EATON, et al., DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST Defendants. THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 Ruben Ventura (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on June 11, 2021. (ECF No. 1). It appears from the face of the complaint that Plaintiff did not exhaust his available administrative remedies before filing this action. Plaintiff admits that administrative remedies were available and that he did not file a grievance. (Id. at 3 & 4). Accordingly, the Court will order Plaintiff to file a response within thirty days, explaining why this action should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust available administrative remedies. Such…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.