Hurley

(PC) Diaz v. Hurley

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20212:19-cv-01241California395 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIGUEL ENRIQUE DIAZ, No. 2:19-cv-1241 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ASSOCIATE WARDEN HURLEY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. Two motions for extensions of time are pending. First, plaintiff seeks an extension of time to file objections to the May 24, 2021 findings and recommendations. Good cause appearing, plaintiff’s request is granted. Second, on June 14, 2021, plaintiff filed a notice of election in response to the court’s screening order (ECF No. 59). Plaintiff elects to file a second amended complaint, and seeks an additional forty-five days to do so. Good cause appearing, plaintiff’s request is granted. Plaintiff is reminded that he is not required to cite legal authorities in his pleading. Rather, plaintiff must set forth “sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.