(PC) Kendrid v. Miller

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20212:21-cv-00612California448 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FORREST KENDRID, No. 2:21-cv-0612 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

L. MILLER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a civil detainee. By order filed April 8, 2021, plaintiff was ordered to file, within thirty days, a request to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the appropriate filing fee, and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration, and on April 28, 2021, plaintiff was ordered to submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty days, and plaintiff was provided the appropriate form. On May 11, 2021, plaintiff was reminded that this action could not proceed until plaintiff submitted his request to proceed in forma pauperis, which was due on or before May 28, 2021. (ECF No. 9.) Further, the court noted that plaintiff previously submitted a request to proceed in forma pauperis in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.