Alameda

(PC) Miller v. Alameda

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20212:21-cv-00653California1,014 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ELIJAH LEE MILLER, Case No. 2:21-cv-00653-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: v. (1) FILE AN AMENDED

COMPLAINT; OR

S. ALAMEDA, et al., (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE Defendants. WISHES TO STAND BY HIS

COMPLAINT, SUBJECT TO

DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION ECF No. 11 SIXTY-DAY DEADLINE 18 19 Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, like its predecessor, does not survive screening. It raises multiple, unrelated claims against more than one defendant and is so difficult to understand that it fails to give defendants notice of the claims against them. I will give plaintiff one more chance to amend his complaint before recommending that it be dismissed.

25 26

28 Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen a prisoner’s complaint that seeks relief against a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.