Lockwood

(PC) Rood v. Lockwood

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20212:19-cv-01806California694 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COLTON JAMES ROOD, No. 2:19-cv-1806 KJM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

LOCKWOOD, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former county and current state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 13, 2021, the court screened the complaint and found that plaintiff’s allegations against defendants Lockwood, Clark, and Van Gerwen stated claims for relief while his claims against defendant Shasta County Jail Hiring Authority were insufficient. ECF No. 13. Plaintiff was given the option of amending the complaint or proceeding immediately on his claims against defendants Lockwood, Clark, and Van Gerwen. Id. at 8. He was further advised that if he failed to notify the court how he wanted to proceed, the court would assume that he was choosing to proceed on the complaint as screened and would recommend dismissal without prejudice of the claims against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.