Bonilla

Bonilla v. California Highway Patrol

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20212:16-cv-01742California7,683 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNTED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 GUILLERMO BONILLA, SANDRA ) 2:16-cv-01742 LEK AMAYA BONILLA, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL AN ) AGENEY OF THE STATE OF ) CALIFORNIA; OFFER MCKENZIE ) AND SGT. PETERSON and DOES ) TO 50, ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________) 20 21 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Before the Court is Defendants California Highway Patrol (“Highway Patrol”) and Muriel McKenzie’s (“McKenzie” and collectively “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion”), filed on January 16, 2019. [Dkt. no. 72.] Plaintiffs Guillermo Bonilla and Sandra Amaya Bonilla (“Plaintiffs”) filed their memorandum in opposition on February 26, 2019, and Defendants filed their reply on March 12,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.