Hurtado

(PC) Adkins v. Hurtado

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20212:21-cv-00531California1,186 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DUPREE LAMONT ADKINS, Case No. 2:21-cv-00531-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

v. PAUPERIS D. HURTADO, ECF No. 2 Defendant. SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: (1) FILE AN AMENDED

COMPLAINT; OR

16 (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE WISHES TO STAND BY HIS

COMPLAINT, SUBJECT TO

DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS AND

DEFENDANTS

19 ECF No. 1

SIXTY-DAY DEADLINE

21 Plaintiff Dupree Lamont Adkins is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleges that defendant D. Hurtado, the Chief Deputy Warden at the California Medical Facility, violated his constitutional rights by denying a grievance and refusing to investigate whether plaintiff was receiving less prison library time than other, similarly situated white…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.