(PC)Payne

(PC)Payne v. Lim

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20212:20-cv-01231California3,215 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAVANCE ROSS PAYNE, No. 2:20-cv-1231 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JAMES T. LIM, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendant was deliberately indifferent to plaintiff’s medical needs in violation of his Eighth Amendment rights. Before the court is plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) and his complaint for screening (ECF No. 1). IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (ECF No. 2.) Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By this order, plaintiff will be assessed an initial partial filing fee in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). By…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.