Sherman

(PC) Sharpe v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20211:19-cv-00711California4,817 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADAM SHARPE, No. 1:19-cv-00711-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS

v.

AGAINST DEFENDANT SMITH BE

C. CRYER, et al., DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

BECAUSE PLAINTIFF FAILED TO

Defendants. EXHAUST AVAILABLE ADMINISTRATIVE

REMEDIES

16 (ECF No. 50)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

TWENTY-ONE DAYS

Adam Sharpe (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case proceeds on Plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 1), which he filed on May 21, 2019, against Defendant C. Cryer, J. Lewis and S. Gates for deliberate indifference to a serious medical condition in violation of the Eighth Amendment and against Defendant S. Smith for failure to protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 33). On December 24, 2020, Defendants filed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.