Dahl

(PC) Adams v. Dahl

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20211:20-cv-00852California533 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL ADAMS, Case No. 1:20-cv-00852-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT

v.

DAHL, et al., (Doc. 6) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff filed a motion to amend the complaint as a matter of course under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) or as a supplemental pleading under Rule 15(d). Rule 15(a)(2) provides that “[t]he court should freely give leave when justice so requires.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). Upon consideration of the motion and review of the Amended Complaint, the Court GRANTS the Plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint. (Doc. 6.) Plaintiff’s first amended complaint is deemed the operative complaint for screening. (See Doc. 7.) This Court notes that Plaintiff has more than three “strikes” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), which provides: In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action . . . under this section if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.