Chothia

(PC) Brown v. Chothia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20211:19-cv-00352California904 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EUGENE C. BROWN, Case No. 1:19-cv-00352-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

C. CHOTHIA, et al.,

Defendants. (ECF No. 81) 16 Plaintiff Eugene C. Brown (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion filed by Defendants Allen, Artis, Chothia, Crutchfield, Gilmore, Jukes, Kempe, Londono, Shaw, and Walker’s (“Defendants”) requesting a twenty-one-day extension of time to file a reply 20 in support of their motion for summary judgment and for leave to file a reply brief totaling fifteen 21 pages. (ECF No. 81.) Because the Court previously granted Defendants’ motion, the Court will 22 construe Plaintiff’s opposition as a motion for reconsideration. 23 On December 7, 2020, the Court held a Discovery and Status Conference, which the 24 parties attended telephonically. (ECF Nos.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.