Chothia
(PC) Brown v. Chothia
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EUGENE C. BROWN, Case No. 1:19-cv-00352-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR RECONSIDERATION
C. CHOTHIA, et al.,
Defendants. (ECF No. 81) 16 Plaintiff Eugene C. Brown (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion filed by Defendants Allen, Artis, Chothia, Crutchfield, Gilmore, Jukes, Kempe, Londono, Shaw, and Walker’s (“Defendants”) requesting a twenty-one-day extension of time to file a reply 20 in support of their motion for summary judgment and for leave to file a reply brief totaling fifteen 21 pages. (ECF No. 81.) Because the Court previously granted Defendants’ motion, the Court will 22 construe Plaintiff’s opposition as a motion for reconsideration. 23 On December 7, 2020, the Court held a Discovery and Status Conference, which the 24 parties attended telephonically. (ECF Nos.…