1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 STANLEY CARL SAHM, No. 2:20-cv-01941 DB P 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

13 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

14 REHABILITATION, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner seeks habeas relief in relation to his 1988 murder 19 convictions. By order dated January 21, 2021, the court screened the petition and determined it 20 should be dismissed as plaintiff’s claims would not impact the duration of his sentence, sought to 21 overturn a BPH decision, and were potentially unexhausted. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff was given 22 sixty days leave to file an amended petition and warned that failure to file an amended petition 23 would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (ECF No. 4 at 6-7.) Those sixty 24 days have passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended petition, requested additional time to file 25 an amended petition, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, the court will 26 recommend that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court 27 orders. 28 //// 1 For the reasons state above, the Clerk of the Court is ORDERED to randomly assign a 2 | district judge to this action. 3 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 4 | Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 5 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 6 | assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within thirty days after 7 | being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with 8 | the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to 9 | Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 10 | objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 11 | Martinez v. Yist, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 12 | Dated: April 22, 2021 13 14 15 ORAH BARNES

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

16 17 18 19 DB: 1/Orders/Prisoner/Habeas/sahm194 1 .f&r.dism

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28