(HC) Sahm v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 STANLEY CARL SAHM, No. 2:20-cv-01941 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner seeks habeas relief in relation to his 1988 murder convictions. By order dated January 21, 2021, the court screened the petition and determined it should be dismissed as plaintiff’s claims would not impact the duration of his sentence, sought to overturn a BPH decision, and were potentially unexhausted. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff was given sixty days leave to file an amended petition and warned that failure to file an amended petition would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (ECF No. 4 at 6-7.) Those sixty days have passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended petition, requested additional time…