(HC) Sahm v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20212:20-cv-01941California405 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 STANLEY CARL SAHM, No. 2:20-cv-01941 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner seeks habeas relief in relation to his 1988 murder convictions. By order dated January 21, 2021, the court screened the petition and determined it should be dismissed as plaintiff’s claims would not impact the duration of his sentence, sought to overturn a BPH decision, and were potentially unexhausted. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff was given sixty days leave to file an amended petition and warned that failure to file an amended petition would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (ECF No. 4 at 6-7.) Those sixty days have passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended petition, requested additional time…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.