Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GRAME KALI KANONGATAA, Case No. 2:20-cv-01116-JAM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO STATE A CLAIM

SCOTT JONES, et al.

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

Defendants. DAYS 16 17 On January 4, 2021, the court screened plaintiff’s second amended complaint and notified plaintiff that it failed to state a claim. ECF No. 18. Plaintiff was granted sixty days to file an amended complaint. Id. To date, plaintiff has not filed a third amended complaint. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute or failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 25 …