(PS) Shaw v. Kaiser Permanente Vallejo Medical Center
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAN SHAW, No. 2:21-cv-0617 JAM DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK
TO SEND MATERIALS FOR SERVICE
KAISER PERMANENTE VALLEJO AND REQUIRING SERVICE BY
MEDICAL CENTER, UNITED STATES MARSHAL
15 Defendant. 17 Plaintiff Dan Shaw is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the court are plaintiff’s complaint and motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) Therein, plaintiff complain that the defendant has violated the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq., (“ADA”). The court is required to screen complaints brought by parties proceeding in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). Here, plaintiff’s in forma pauperis…