Gosai

(PC) Hicks v. Gosai

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 26, 20212:20-cv-02303California501 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARYL ANTHONY HICKS, Case No. 2:20-cv-02303-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS

GOSAI, et al.,

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

Defendants. DAYS 16 17 On January 22, 2021, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1918A. Plaintiff was notified that it contained unrelated claims that could not proceed in a single lawsuit, and he was granted sixty days to either file an amended complaint or notify the court that he wished to stand by his complaint. ECF No. 7. To date, plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, nor has he notified the court that he wishes to stand by his original complaint. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for plaintiff’s failure to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.