Griggs v. Sacramento City Unified School District

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 26, 20212:20-cv-00724California4,310 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Jonathan Griggs, No. 2:20-CV-0724-KJM-JDP Plaintiff, ORDER v. Sacramento City Unified School District, 1S Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Jonathan Griggs alleges employment discrimination based on race and gender, as 18 well as retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. See generally Compl., ECF No. 1. Defendant Sacramento City Unified School District moves to 20 dismiss the gender and retaliation claims and strike paragraphs eight, seventeen, and twenty-one ofthe complaint. Mot. at 1-2, ECF No. 6. Griggs opposes the motion. Opp’n, ECF No. 9. The 22 court grants in part the motion to dismiss! with leave to amend and denies the motion to strike. XI. JUDICIAL NOTICE Each party has filed a request for judicial notice. The District requests the court take 25 judicial notice of the “Notice of Charge of Discrimination” it received from the United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.