Haris
(PC) Allen v. Haris
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TELLY ALLEN, Case No. 2:20-cv-02396-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE
TO STATE A CLAIM
HARIS,
RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE
Defendant. DAYS 16 17 On February 3, 2021, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint and notified plaintiff that the complaint failed to state a claim. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff was granted sixty days to file an amended complaint. Id. To date, plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute or failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988). …