(PC) Curry v. Sessions
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RYAN INDIANA CURRY, Case No. 2:20-cv-00227-TLN-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE
TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS
SESSIONS, et al.,
RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE
Defendants. DAYS 16 17 Defendants have filed a motion that seeks terminating sanction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37. ECF No. 43. On March 9, 2021, I ordered plaintiff to file a response to defendants’ motion by no later than March 30, 2021. ECF No. 44. In violation of that order, plaintiff failed to file either an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendants’ motion. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute or failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Hells…