Ceballos

(PC) Bradford v. Ceballos

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 26, 20211:20-cv-01821California988 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, No. 1:20-cv-01821-DAD-SAB Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

J. CEBALLOS, et al., (Doc. No. 7) Defendant.

16 Plaintiff Raymond Alford Bradford is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 6, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and that he be required to pay the $400 filing fee in full to proceed with this action because: (1) he is subject to the three strikes bar under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); and (2) the allegations of plaintiff’s complaint do not satisfy the “imminent danger of serious physical injury” exception to § 1915(g). (Doc. No. 4 at 2–4.) On February 1, 2021, the undersigned…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.