Diaz

(PC) Lake v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 26, 20212:20-cv-02077California343 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN LAKE, No. 2:20-cv-2077 JAM DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RALPH DIAZ, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order dated January 20, 2021, the court screened the complaint and determined it did not contain any cognizable claims. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff was given sixty days leave to file an amended complaint and warned that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Those sixty days have passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, requested additional time to file an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s orders. Accordingly, the court will recommend that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.