(PC) Harris v. California Forensic Medical Group
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ANTOINE W. HARRIS, No. 2:19-cv-02020 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, et al., 14 Defendants.
16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 17 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants acted with negligence and committed medical 18 malpractice. By order dated October 15, 2020, the court screened the complaint and determined 19 it did not contain any cognizable claims. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff was given sixty days leave to file 20 an amended complaint and warned that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a 21 recommendation that this action be dismissed. (ECF No. 6 at 13.) On October 30, 2020, plaintiff 22 filed notice of change of address. (ECF No. 9.) The court’s October 15, 2020 order was re- 23 served on the plaintiff on November 2, 2020. 24 Sixty days have passed from the re-service of the court’s October 15, 2020 order. Plaintiff 25 has not filed…