Emerson

(PC) Dillingham v. Emerson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 27, 20211:18-cv-00507California2,069 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JERRY DILLINGHAM, Case No. 1:18-cv-00507-AWI-SAB (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL, AND DIRECTING ANY v. OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ PENDING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE

N. EMERSON, et al., FILED WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

14 Defendants. (ECF No. 102) 15 Plaintiff Jerry Dillingham is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to compel, filed on March 4, 2021. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s second amended complaint against Defendants Emerson, Wilson, Wescoat, Velasco, Loftin, Martinez, Marsh and Doe 1 for conditions of confinement in violation of the Eighth Amendment, and against Defendant Wescoat for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.