Borges

(PC) Grant v. Borges

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 27, 20211:20-cv-00908California999 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 RUSSELL S. GRANT, Case No. 1:20-cv-00908-NONE-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF PRO BONO v. COUNSEL, WITHOUT PREJUDICE

D. RIOS, (ECF No. 26)

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR

Defendant.

EXTENSION OF TIME AND COPIES OF

MOTIONS

(ECF No. 27)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO SEND

PLAINTIFF COPY OF SCREENING FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATIONS (ECF NO. 13)

AND ORDER REQUIRING INITIAL

DISCLOSURES (ECF NO. 21)

21 Russell Grant (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 19, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of pro bono counsel. (ECF No. 26). Plaintiff also filed a motion for an extension of time, which includes a request for copies of motions he filed in this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.