Hubbard

(PC) Ruiz v. Hubbard

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 27, 20212:19-cv-02350California543 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, No. 2:19-cv-2350 JAM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER A.HUBBARD, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a motion reconsideration of his request to proceed in forma pauperis and the order dismissing this case. ECF No. 23. Plaintiff has moved for reconsideration of the order denying his application to proceed in forma pauperis. This is plaintiff’s third such motion. See ECF Nos. 13, 16. As with plaintiff’s previous motion, the majority of the motion is in Spanish and he states that his new evidence is presented in Spanish because he cannot write in English. ECF No. 23 at 1; ECF No. 24. Plaintiff has previously been advised that in order to be considered his filings must be in English. ECF No. 20. Furthermore, though plaintiff states that he is unable to write in English, his filings are all at least partially written in English. Because the portions of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.