Bonta

California Chamber of Commerce v. Bonta

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 25, 20212:19-cv-02019California2,026 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 California Chamber of Commerce, No. 2:19-cv-02019-KJM-JDP Plaintiff, ORDER Vv. Rob Bonta in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, Defendant. and Council for Education and Research on Toxics, Defendant-Intervenor 20 21 The Chemical Toxin Working Group, doing business as Healthy Living Foundation or “HLF,” applies ex parte for leave to intervene as a defendant and to file an appeal as a nonparty. ECF No. 128. It requests relief on an expedited basis. The ex parte application is denied. In this case, the California Chamber of Commerce contends a California law commonly known as “Proposition 65” violates the First Amendment by requiring warnings about the dangers of acrylamide in food and drinks. In a previous order, the court granted the Chamber’s motion for apreliminary injunction barring new private enforcement…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.